On this page you will find a pure text listing of all the presentations
to be delivered at ASSC6. They are listed in the order of their
code, starting with the plenary lectures.
You can easily locate the contribution of any particular author
by using your browser's find function. To print the entire document,
simply select the text and paste it into any text processing
package.
(These abstracts will
also be available at the ASSC6 book, delivered at the Welcome
Desk of the Science Museum.)
PL-01
Aware or unaware? Verbal and Non-Verbal Assessment of Blindsight
Petra Stoerig
Contact:
Petra Stoerig (petra.stoerig@uni-duesseldorf.de)
Institut für Experimentelle Psychologie II Heinrich-Heine-Universität
Universitätsstr. 1
D-40225 Düsseldorf
GERMANY
In human and
non-human primates, lesions of the primary visual cortex produce
visual field defects. Again in both species, residual detection,
localization, and discrimination of visual targets can be demonstrated
with
forced-choice paradigms, but only the human patients can be
asked whether or not they perceive any of the stimuli they respond
to. To learn whether the disscociation between visual awareness
and visually guided behaviour that characterizes Blindsight
is found in both species, Alan Cowey and I combined a forced-choice
localization with a signal detection task in an attempt to non-verbally
assess visual awareness. Four hemianopic monkeys and four human
subjects, two with absolute defects, one with a relative hemianopia,
and one with absolute as well as relative regions of cortical
blindnesss were tested. First, 2AFC manual localization of 200ms
square-wave grating stimuli was measured as a function of contrast.
In addition, the human subjects gave verbal 'seen'-responses
which were consistently at 0% in the absolutely blind regions.
The second task was similar to the first in that stimuli which
could appear in either hemifield were to be localized as before.
In addition, on a varying proportion of trials no stimulus appeared,
and to indicate these blank trials, a 'no'-area now constantly
present above the central startlight was to be touched. Results
showed that the human subjects' indicated a blank whenever a
localizable stimulus appeared in the absolute defect, but indicated
a stimulus on a proportion of trials presented in the relative
defects. The non-verbal responses thus matched the verbal ones
quite well. As the monkeys only very rarely touched stimuli
in their hemianopic field when being given the chance to indicate
a blank instead, it seems that monkeys have no conscious vision
in the hemianopic field but show blindsight like human patients.
PL-02
On the content of chimpanzee consciousness
Daniel J. Povinelli
Contact:
Daniel J. Povinelli (ceg@louisiana.edu)
Institute of Cognitive Science
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Rougeou Hall Room 348
241 East Lewis Street Lafayette
Lafayette, LA 70504-3772
USA
In this talk,
I describe a theory concerning differences in the nature of
the concepts which may populate the minds of chimpanzees and
humans. Although the minds of humans and chimpanzees may share
many kinds of concepts in common, recent evidence suggests that
chimpanzees may be quite limited in their ability to generate
concepts of unobservable entities. In particular, I review the
evidence concerning their understanding of mental states (e.g.,
intentions, beliefs, perceptions, desires) and causal phenomena
(e.g., gravity, force, weight, physical connection). I conclude
that although concepts of these kinds develop early in human
development, there is substantial reason to think that chimpanzees
do not form them at all. Instead, they appear to be specialized
in reasoning about the observable manifestations of such unobservable
states and phenomena.
PL-03
Rationality and Reasoning Without Language
José Luis Bermúdez
Contact:
José Luis Bermúdez (jb10@stir.ac.uk)
Department of Philosophy
University of Stirling
Stirling FK9 4LA
Explaining
the behavior of non-linguistic creatures in psychological terms
requires attributing to them beliefs and desires that in some
sense rationalize their actions. Clearly, therefore, we need
a notion of rationality that is applicable at the non-linguistic
level. The paper suggests that the standard inference-based
conception of rationality is inapplicable to non-linguistic
creatures. There is no evidence of mastery of logical concepts
in the absence of language. The paper describes three different
senses in which the behaviour of non-linguistic creatures can
be described as rational and explores the consequences for our
understanding of non-linguistic creatures.
PL-04
The early development of executive function: A levels of consciousness
approach
Philip David Zelazo
Contact:
Philip David Zelazo (Zelazo@psych.utoronto.ca)
Department of Psychology
University of Toronto 100
St. George Street
Toronto, ON M5S 3G3
CANADA
In this talk,
I will discuss the Levels of Consciousness (LOC) Model, according
to which age-related in the conscious control of behavior depend
on age-related increases in self-reflection that permit children
to formulate and use increasingly complex systems of action-oriented
verbal rules.
PL-05
A dualism of dependent variables
Larry Weiskrantz
Contact:
Larry Weiskrantz (larry.weiskrantz@psy.ox.ac.uk)
University of Oxford
Dept. of Experimental Psychology
South Parks Road
Oxford OX1 3UD
UK
Several examples
- taken mainly from neuropsychology - will be given of the insufficiency
of on-line measures for concluding that a person or animal is
conscious of ongoing events (Astate consciousness@). Off-line
confirmation as well as the on-line measure is necessary. In
humans this is typically, but not necessarily, a report by the
subject; in animals it usually has to be experimentally contrived.
Experimental research on the status and the underlying mechanisms
of state consciousness is dependent on the conjunction and/or
disjunction of the systems underlying both dependent variables.
Some fMRI and event-related potential evidence will be discussed
in relation to a putative on-line posterior processing system
and an anterior commentary system..
PL-06
The end of anonymous phenomenology?
Anthony I. Jack
Contact:
Anthony I. Jack (ajack@light.wustl.edu)
Washington University Campus Box 8225
4525 Scott Avenue
St Louis, Missouri 63110
USA
What is the
scientific status of subject reports? Current attitudes in cognitive
science are complex, yet the mainstream consensus is clear:
Reports can provide interesting, even important, anecdotal evidence.
Yet, real experimental 'results' must be established by objective
evidence.
In this talk
I will discuss some basic philosophical issues and relate them
directly to scientific practice. Different views on the methodology
for a 'science of consciousness' relate to different philosophical
positions on the meaning of mental state terms. My position
offers an alternative to Dennett's neo-behaviorism and to the
neo-Cartesian views of Searle, Chalmers and Block. Cognitive
science can, and should, transform itself into the science of
consciousness. It can do so simply by changing its attitude
to introspective evidence.
PL-07
Why Are Verbally Expressed Thoughts Conscious?
David M. Rosenthal
Contact:
David M. Rosenthal (drosenth@artsci.wustl.edu)
Clark-Way-Harrison Visiting Professor
Program in Philosophy, Neuroscience, and Psychology
Washington University in St. Louis
(January-June 2002)
Department
of Philosophy
Campus Box 1073
One Brookings Drive
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
It's generally recognized that there a close tie between consciousness
and speech. One reason is that it seems that all verbally expressed
thoughts are conscious. But it's not easy to explain this connection.
We can't appeal to speech acts' being deliberate actions that
require conscious mental antecedents, since speech acts are
seldom deliberate and deliberate action can result from nonconscious
antecedents.
A natural explanation does, however, flow from the higher- order-thought
(HOT) hypothesis, on which a mental state's being conscious
consists in its being accompanied by a seemingly nonin- ferential
thought that one is in that state. We recognize, simply by being
linguistically competent, that the speech acts of saying that
p and saying one thinks that p have the same performance conditions,
even though their truth conditions differ. So, when- ever one
says that p, one could equally have said one thinks that p.
The best explanation is that, whenever one says that p, one
actually has the HOT one would express by saying one thinks
that p. This also points to an explanation of why one's saying
one thinks that p is an exception--why one isn't then conscious
of the thought one's speech act expresses, but only the thought
one thereby reports.
PL-08
Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience
and meta-consciousness
Jonathan W. Schooler
Contact:
Jonathan Schooler (schooler+@pitt.edu)
Department of Psychology
518 Learning Research and Development Center
3939 O'Hara St.
University of Pittsburg
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
A distinction
is drawn between conscious experience and the explicit awareness
(meta-consciousness) of that experience. Whereas experience
is continuous, meta-consciousness is hypothesized to occur only
intermittently in response to goal failures, self-reflection,
or requests for self-reports. Two types of dissociations follow
from the notion that meta-consciousness involves the intermittent
re-representation of the contents of consciousness. Temporal
dissociations occur when an individual, who previously lacked
meta-consciousness about the contents of consciousness, directs
meta-consciousness towards those contents. The case of catching
one's mind wandering during reading illustrates a temporal dissociation.
Once meta-consciousness is triggered, translation dissociations
may occur if the re-representation process misrepresents the
original experience. Such translation dissociations are particularly
likely when one verbally reflects on non-verbal experiences
or attempts to takes stock of subtle/ambiguous experiences.
This review describes empirical evidence for temporal and translation
dissociations and explores their implications for conceptualizing
consciousness.
PL-09
Consciousness, Attention, and Reportability
Jesse Prinz
Contact:
Jesse Prinz (jesse@subcortex.com)
SAS Philosophy Programme
University of London
Senate House, Malet Street
London, WC1E 7HU, ENGLAND
Many of our
conscious states seem to be reportable. This raises two important
questions. Why is there a link between consciousness and reportability?
And, Is that link necessary? I defend a neurofunctional theory
of consciousness that helps provide answers. (A neurofunctioanl
theory is one that explains consciousness by appeal to brain
states, but characterizes those states in terms of their functional
role, at both local and psychological levels of analysis.) According
to the theory, consciousness arises when hierarchically organized
sensory systems send afferent signals to working memory systems
via dynamic changes in connectivity modulated by selective and
ambient attention. Because working memory plays a central role
in reportability, conscious states are typically reportable.
They are not necessarily reportable, however. I present a principle
that distinguishes conditions under which conscious states will
be reportable, and I offer an argument for denying the existence
of unreportable conscious states that meet those conditions.
I also use this analysis to raise two implications for the alleged
distinction between access and phenomenal consciousness. First,
all phenomenology requires access on the theory I defend. Second,
the construct of access can be subdivided into two distinct
notions, corresponding to availability to working memory and
encoding in working memory. I argue that only the former is
essential to consciousness.
PL-10
Artificial Collective Consciousness
Luc Steels
Contact:
Luc Steels (steels@arti.vub.ac.be)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Pleinlaan 2
1050 Brussels
Sony Computer
Science Laboratory - Paris
There has
been much speculation on the ability and inability of a robot
to be conscious. For some, a conscious robot is a contradiction
in terms - even though it may be an interesting source of thought
experiments. Others argue that certain aspects of consciousness
(such as attention or reflection) are necessary for a very complex
autonomous agent engaged in sensori-motor processing, planning
or language and that therefore these aspects will progressively
appear in robots as they become more complex. In this talk I
want to address the issue of collective consciousness. How can
there be a sense of conceptual coherence in a population of
distributed individuals which, at least at first sight, do not
have any direct physical access nor control to each other's
internal brain states. Innate archetypes or quantum physics
has been invoked to explain this kind of coherence. I will argue
however that this need not be the case and show in multi-agent
simulations how iterated interactions between adaptive agents
may cause the self-organisation of shared concepts and interpretations
of reality.
PL-11
Unconscious semantic priming
Pío Tudela
Contact:
Pío Tudela
Department of Psychology
University of Granada
Campus de Cartuja
18001 Granada
SPAIN
The existence
of unconscious semantic processing has been a highly debated
and theoretically relevant issue both in the realm of attentional
as well as perceptual research. In our lab, we have approached
this problem using a semantic priming procedure in which awareness
of the prime was varied in two different ways. First we employed
a backward masking procedure to prevent conscious detection
and identification of the prime as measured by both subjective
and objective awareness thresholds Second, awareness of the
prime was manipulated by changing the distribution of attention
over the visual field and by studying the semantic priming produced
by parafoveally presented primes. Our results consistently show
semantic priming produced by primes of which participants are
unaware.
In the first
part of my lecture I will present and discuss behavioral data
supporting unconscious semantic priming. In the second part,
I will present data based on event related potentials (ERPs)
suggesting that the scalp signature associated to the priming
effect produced by unconscious primes is different, both in
time and topography, from the scalp signature associated to
the priming effect produced by conscious primes. I will comment
our results in the context of present cognitive neuroscience
research.
PL-12
Conscious and Unconscious Aspects of Language Structure
Ray Jackendoff
Contact:
Ray Jackendoff (jackendoff@brandeis.edu)
Dept of Psychology
Brandeis University
Waltham, MA 02454
USA
The structure
of language includes three major components: Phonological
(sound) structure, syntactic (phrase) structure, and conceptual
(meaning) structure. Of these components, the one that appears
to correspond most closely to the phenomenology of language
is phonological structure: we hear strings of words, both in
hearing others speak and in our own linguistic imagery. I will
conclude that, with the exception of certain very coarse features,
the structure of thought/conceptualization is entirely unconscious.
I will show how this relation between language and consciousness
accounts for a number of puzzles in philosophy of mind and philosophy
of language.
PL-13
Do Small Balls Squeak? Re-evaluating Neonatal Synesthesia
Daphne Maurer
Contact:
Daphne Maurer (maurer@mcmaster.ca)
Dept. of Psychology
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario
Canada L8S 2A4
Because newborns
share certain brain mechanisms with synesthetes, we have hypothesized
that the newborn's senses are undifferentiated and easily confused
(Maurer & Maurer, 1988; Maurer & Mondloch, 1996). We
will re-evaluate this hypothesis based on recent studies of
adult synesthetes (e.g., Smilek & Dixon, 2002; Ramachandran
& Hubbard, 2001), of neural mechanisms in the congenitally
deaf and blind (e.g., Bavelier & Neville, 2001), and our
own data from young children. We tested 30- to 36-month-olds
for sensitivity to a correspondence reported by adult synesthetes:
the link between higher-pitched sounds and smaller, brighter
percepts (e.g., Marks, 1974).
Children were presented with a central auditory stimulus that
varied in frequency (with intensity jittered to make it irrelevant)
while viewing two bouncing balls that varied in size and/or
luminance. They were asked to point to the ball that was making
the sound. In Exp. 1 (n=12), children linked the higher-pitched
sound with the ball that was smaller and brighter (p <.01).
InExperiments 2 and 3, they made the link based only on size
(n=12; p <.01) and only on luminance (n=24; p <.01), thereby
demonstrating sensitivity even when tested with a link not prevalent
in the environment.
Collectively, the evidence suggests that there are natural synesthetic
correspondences influencing the development of perception and
language.
PL-14
Synesthesia, Qualia and Consciousness
Edward M. Hubbard
Contact:
Edward M. Hubbard (edhubbard@psy.ucsd.edu)
Department of Psychology
University of California, San Diego
9500 Gilman Dr. 0109
La Jolla, CA 92093-0109 USA
People with
grapheme-color synesthesia report the novel conscious experience
of seeing specific colors when viewing specific letters and
numbers. We have previously shown that these synesthetic colors
can lead to the pop-out and texture segregation (Ramachandran
& Hubbard, 2001). Additionally, we have demonstrated a form
of "blindsight" in synesthesia. When subjects are
asked to identify stimuli in the periphery, they are significantly
better when the stimulus is presented alone, as opposed to when
it is flanked with distractors ("crowding"). When
presented with crowded graphemes, our synesthetes cannot perceive
the grapheme, but do experience colors, saying, "I can't
see the middle number but it must be an H because it looks green."
Based on this memory association, synestehtes perform significantly
better than control subjects in identifying the target grapheme.
We now report that synesthetically induced colors are not experienced
when stimuli are presented at isoluminance, or at low luminance
contrast, even though the inducing grapheme can be readily identified.
We systematically varied luminance contrast and obtained subjective
ratings on the strength of synesthetic colors. These ratings
are consistent over multiple testing sessions, indicating that
the effect is not confabulatory in origin. Consistent with their
reports of not experiencing synesthetic colors at isoluminance,
synesthetes do not perform better than controls on a texture
segregation task when graphemes are presented at isoluminance.
Collectively these results demonstrate that synesthetes' reports
of colors constitute veridical reports of altered conscious
states and suggest that the study of synesthesia may provide
a novel experimental lever to explore the neural correlates
of consciousness.
PL-15
A Fork in the Road to the Neural Correlate of Consciousness
Ned Block
Contact:
Ned Block (ned.block@nyu.edu)
Department of Philosophy
New York University
Main Bldg, Room 502ª
100 Washington Square East
New York NY 10003
An impressive
body of evidence suggests that the neural correlate of visual
consciousness is to be found in higher areas in the occipeto-temporal
stream of processing, different areas for different kinds of
stimuli. But there are circumstances in which these areas are
activated, seemingly without consciousness, apparently due to
failure of normal processing in parietal areas. One possibility
is that visual consciousness has a complex neural correlate
involving events in both the occipeto-temporal stream and parietal
and maybe frontal areas. Another possibility is that the neural
correlate of visual consciousness is entirely confined to the
occipeto-temporal stream but that attentional factors centered
in the parietal areas are required for the visually conscious
states to be accessible and that this access brings in the frontal
areas. These two options represent very different strategies
in research on what consciousness is in the brain. The paper
discusses the pros and cons of both strategies.
CS1-1.1
Disunified Access to a Unified Consciousness?
Tim Bayne
Contact:
Tim Bayne (tbayne@scmp.mq.edu.au)
Department of Philosohpy
Macquarie University
North Ryde
NSW 2109
AUSTRALIA
Many disorders
of consciousness have the following structure: the patient is
able to report one state of consciousness (S1) in one report
modality but not in another report modality, yet they are also
able to report another state of consciousness (S2) with the
second report modality but not with the former. For example,
when exposed to the word "tea-cup" a split-brain patient
may say that she saw the word "cup" but not the word
"tea". Yet, if asked to produce a left-handed written
report of what she saw, the patient may write the word "tea."
Similar dissociations in reportability can be found in unilateral
neglect, the "hidden observer" in hypnosis, and Marcel's
experiments. Most commentators assume that such dissociation
in report modality provides evidence for disunity in the phenomenal
structure of the subject's consciousness. Such a position seems
to rest on the tacit assumption that it is not possible for
phenomenally unified states of consciousness to be accessible
to distinct report-modalities. I argue that this assumption
is unwarranted, and that disunity in access to consciousness
doesn't settle the question of disunity in the structure of
phenomenal consciousness.
CS1-1.2
Knowing 'where' without knowing 'what': Orienting and spatial
localization in the split brain
Diego Fernandez-Duque & Sandra E. Black
Contact:
Diego Fernandez-Duque (diego@rotman-baycrest.on.ca)
Cognitive Neurology, A421
Sunnybrook and Women's College
Health Science Centre
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario
CANADA, M4N 3M5
A patient
with posterior callosotomy and right mediofrontal stroke was
assessed in his ability to recognize and localize objects, as
well as in the ability to split attention between and within
visual hemifields. When a set of pac-men was briefly displayed
in the right visual field, the patient was able to recognize
both shape and location. In contrast, when stimuli were displayed
in the left visual field, he was unable to report object features
either verbally or with his right hand. These data reveal an
impaired callosal transfer of object information. In contrast,
spatial localization of objects was unimpaired, even in the
left visual field. A covert orienting task revealed that attention
was split more effectively between visual hemifields than within
a given hemifield, a result that suggest a possible role of
spatial attention in the localization of unrecognized objects.
FUNDING SUPPORT: This research was supported by a post-doctoral
fellowship from the Rotman Research Institute, and by grants
to the first author from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of
Ontario, and by the Center for Consciousness Studies of the
University of Arizona.
CS1-1.3
'K' is for ketamine: an fMRI study of the neural correlates
of a ketamine-induced psychotic state on word generation
Cynthia H.Y. Fu, Kathryn Abel, Matthew Allin, Nanda Vythelingum,
Sergi Costafreda, Steve C.R. Williams & Philip K. McGuire
Contact:
Cynthia H.Y. Fu (c.fu@iop.kcl.ac.uk)
Section of Neuroimaging
Division of Psychological Medicine
Institute of Psychiatry
King's College London
De Crespigny Park
London SE5 8AF
United Kingdom
Introduction:
Phencyclidine (PCP) produces a brief psychotic state in healthy
volunteers that is comparable with the symptoms of schizophrenia.
A fundamental neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia is impairments
in language processing. Letter verbal fluency is a classical
measure of general language abilities in which subjects are
required to generate a word in response to letter cues. We sought
to examine the neural correlates of an acute psychotic state
induced by ketamine (an analogue of PCP) in healthy volunteers
as they performed a verbal fluency task. Methods: Eleven healthy
male volunteers (mean age 28 years) received either intravenous
ketamine or placebo in a double-blind manner, while performing
an overt verbal fluency task. FMRI data were acquired at 1.5
T. Results: During the ketamine infusion, subjects developed
acute psychotic symptoms. The fMRI data revealed a main effect
of ketamine, as compared to placebo, with increased activity
in the anterior cingulate, prefrontal and parietal cortices,
insula and basal ganglia. During the verbal fluency task, relative
to placebo, ketamine was associated with greater activation
in the prefrontal cortices and basal ganglia. Discussion: A
ketamine-induced psychotic state was associated with increased
activity in a distributed set of cortical and subcortical regions
and a significant modulation of task-related activation during
verbal fluency. The latter interaction implicates a prefrontal-striatal
network that normally mediates executive aspects of language
function in the pathophysiology of an acute psychotic state.
CS1-1.4
A New Look on Neuropsychological and Psychopathological Syndromes
as Derived from a "What" versus "How" Taxonomy
of Functions: Its Relevance for Dealing with Consciousness
Paloma Enríquez and Ernst Pöppel
Contact:
Paloma Enríquez (penriquez@psi.uned.es)
Departamento de Psicobiología
UNED
Ciudad Universitaria
28040 Madrid
In the late
eighties a new taxonomy for the understanding of neuropsychological
deficits was proposed (Pöppel, 1988, 1989). This taxonomy
distinguished two broad kinds of brain functions, from which
two distinct categories of neuropsychological disturbances (depending
on their aetiological origin) were derived: They were referred
to as 'what' and 'how' functions.
'What functions'
refer to specific located psychological functions. This approach
corresponds to the usual cartographic neuropsychological view,
grounded on the classical localisationist perspective. By contrast,
'How functions' refer to more dynamic logistical (less or not
located) brain functions which support the specific 'what' activity.
This critical kind of brain functions has been neglected as
a separate functional domain from a more classical perspective
on neuropsychology prevailing even today.
The 'What/How'
taxonomy, and specifically the focus on the now re-identified
'How functions' suggests a new and conciliate look on several
fields usually treated from very distinct perspectives, allowing
to conceive challenging new ways towards a possible future integration
between them:
1. Direct
applications to neuropsychological deficits.
2. New applications
to psychopathological syndromes, as for instance those involving
dissociative disturbances.
3. Main derivations
for dealing with some of the core (and yet unsolved) problems
of psychology and neuroscience, as that of consciousness.
CS1-2.1
A new wave of brain imaging evidence fits novel predictions
from global workspace theory: The conscious access hypothesis
Bernard J. Baars
Contact:
Bernard J. Baars (baars@nsi.edu / bbaars8788@aol.com)
The Neurosciences Institute
10640 John Jay Hopkins Drive
San Diego 92121, USA.
Consciousness
may help mobilize and integrate brain functions that are otherwise
separate and independent. Evidence for this 'conscious access
hypothesis' was described almost two decades ago, in a framework
called global workspace theory (Baars, 1988, 2002). Recent neuroimaging
evidence from different laboratories using different methods
to compare conscious vs. unconscious sensory input, appears
to support the hypothesis (e.g. Dehaene et al, 2001). The methods
include visual backward masking, inattentional blindness, change
blindness, neglect, extinction, sleep-waking, repetition priming,
etc. Versions of the hypothesis are now supported by philosophers
like Daniel Dennett and Ned Block, and by some cognitive and
neuroscientists.
If consciousness
implies global access in the brain it may be needed for any
process that is not completely predictable. It therefore has
implications for perception, learning, working memory, voluntary
control, attention, and self systems in the brain. Gamma synchrony
in the thalamocortical complex may facilitate conscious access.
Baars, B.J.
(1988) A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University
Press. Also at www.nsi.edu/users/baars.
Baars, B.J.
(2002) The conscious access hypothesis: Origins and recent
evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Jan., 6 (1). Also at
www.nsi.edu/users/baars.
Dehaene, S.
et al (2001) Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious
repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752-758.
CS1-2.2
What IDA says about conscious and unconscious language processing
and verbal reports
Stan Franklin
Contact:
Stan Franklin (franklin@memphis.edu)
Computer Science
University of Memphis
Memphis, TN, 38152
USA
A conceptual
and computational model of consciousness provides its answers
to questions of the relationship between consciousness and verbal
report, of the role of verbal reports in the scientific study
of consciousness, and of the characteristics of conscious and
unconsciousness processing of language. In the IDA model, a
complex software agent based on Baars¹ global workspace
theory, incoming language is processed unconsciously by the
perception module prior to selected derived meanings coming
to consciousness. Computational mechanisms for both perception
and consciousness, and their interaction, will be described,
providing hypotheses about the characteristics of unconscious
vs. conscious processing. There is currently no provision for
verbal reports in the model. However, adding it conceptually
or computationally would present no difficulty. Existing mechanisms
within the model will suffice. Consciousness would work perfectly
well with or without verbal report. IDA¹s understanding
and generation of language, while real, is rudimentary by human
standards due to her narrow domain. As a result, the model should
prove useful as an extreme case in the study of the relationship
between consciousness and language. Researchers can see what
relations hold even in a relatively primitive system.
CS1-2.3
Searching for a unified science of consciousness
Antti Revonsuo
Contact:
Antti Revonsuo (revonsuo@utu.fi)
Department of Philosophy, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
University of Turku
FIN-20014 Turku
FINLAND
If the diverse
studies on consciousness are supposed to develop into coherent
science, then we should expect a unified research program to
emerge at some point. The unified research program should define
a set of widely shared background assumptions that guide both
empirical and theoretical research, and it should give a clear
and empirically plausible answer to the philosophical questions
concerning the place of consciousness in nature (Revonsuo 2000).
My suggestion for the core assumptions of a unified research
program is Biological Realism or treating consciousness as a
biological phenomenon. This basic assumption implies that the
explanation of consciousness should be done within a biological
framework. Recent advances in the philosophy of neuroscience
indicate that to explain a particular biological phenomenon
involves tracing the different dimensions in a causal-mechanical
network surrounding the phenomenon. This biological explanatory
framework greatly clarifies what it really means to "explain"
consciousness: it turns out that the explanation of consciousness
consists of several different dimensions of explanation, and
different sorts of questions and evidence are relevant for illuminating
each of these explanatory dimensions. The biological framework
also illuminates in a new way the nature of the central research
problems in consciousness studies (e.g. the neural correlates
of consciousness [Revonsuo 2001], the binding problem [Revonsuo
1999]), and could eventually lead to a unified research program
on consciousness.
References
Revonsuo A (1999) Binding and the phenomenal unity of consciousness.
Consciousness and Cognition 8(2), 173-185.
Revonsuo A (2000) Prospects for a scientific research program
on consciousness. In: Metzinger T (Ed.) Neural Correlates of
Consciousness, 57-75. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Revonsuo A (2001) Can functional brain imaging discover consciousness
in the brain? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (3): 3-23.
CS1-2.4
Consciousness and Revolution
William Seager
Contact:
William Seager (seager@utsc.utoronto.ca)
Division of Humanities
Univ. of Toronto at Scarborough
Scarborough, Ontario, Canadaa
M1C 1A4
Consciousness
presents a special, probably unique, challenge to the scientific
world view. Many maintain nonetheless that a way will be found
to smoothly integrate the phenomena of consciousness into science.
Others insist that there is simply no way to integrate consciousness
into a scientific vision of the world, either because of intrinsic
human limitations or because consciousness involves some aspect
of reality that goes beyond what science can investigate.
A third group
of thinkers seeks a way to explain consciousness within science,
while recognising that current science makes no explanatory
contact with it. Such a viewpoint assumes that explicating consciousness
will require a revolution in science. In some ways this is the
most radical position on consciousness, since it is the only
one that explicitly undercuts current science. Yet it has been
espoused, with more or less enthusiasm or reluctance, by a distinguished
and diverse group of thinkers, including Roger Penrose, John
Searle, Thomas Nagel and Noam Chomsky.
This paper
aims to examine the grounds adduced for an impending scientific
revolution forced by the very possibility of a science of consciousness.
Are there common arguments converging on the conclusion that
only a scientific revolution would permit an explication of
consciousness? Or is there merely a disparate set of intuitions
at work here, ultimately only restating the fundamentally mysterious
nature of consciousness?
CS1-3.1
The language of conscious thought
Antoni Gomila
Contact:
Antoni Gomila (tonigomila@teleline.es)
Dep. Psychology
Univ. Balearic Islands
07071 Palma de Mallorca (Spain)
There is a
growing consensus in Cognitive Science in establishing a dual
view of cognition; one that distinguishes between either implicit
and explicit processes, or automatic and controlled, or associative
and rule-based. There are plenty of varieties of this view,
which was much encouraged by the success of the notion of modularity.
I want to explore to what extent this dual view of cognition
coincides with the distinction between unconscious and conscious
processes, and to what extent language acquisition can be thought
of as the key developmental process in giving rise to the duality
of processes. My contention is that the difference between these
two sorts of processes is representational, rejecting the view
that what makes a mental state conscious is different from what
characterizes it functionally.
I will present, first, a range of dual theories of basic processes
(attention, perception, memory, learning, reasoning); second,
I will show that neither of the pairs of opposite processes
can be seen as exclussive and exhaustive, since in development,
what is implicit can become explicit, what is controlled can
become automatic (through practice), what is associative can
become rule-based, and viceversa. Third, I will content that
the main reasons for the existence of a language of thought
hold only for linguistic minds, thus finding a representational
difference between both kinds of processes; and fourth, that
linguistic development correlates with development of the executive
function, which typically involves awareness.
CS1-3.2
Structured Representations and Systematic Revision in Conscious
Mental Processes
Joe Lau
Contact:
Joe Lau (jyflau@hku.hk)
Department of Philosophy
The University of Hong Kong
Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong
Fodor and
Pylyshyn have famously argued that the systematicity of cognition
is best explained by postulating structured, mental representations.
Many connectionists disagree, and they believe that connectionist
networks can exhibit systematicity without invoking structured
representations. In this paper I present a new version of the
systematicity argument. It is suggested that representations
involved in conscious mental processes are subject to systematic
manipulation and revision. For example, part of the phenomenology
of formulating linguistic intentions and action plans is that
they have components that can be modified and replaced easily.
This can be readily explained if the representations involved
in such processes are indeed classically structured representations.
A connectionist alternative might involve representational schemes
using for example RAAM, simple recurrent nets, or holographic
reduced representations. However, I shall argue that there are
various difficulties and inadequacies in employing such schemes
to explain systematic revision in a non-classical manner.
CS1-3.3
Is there any good introspective argument for the language of
thought ?
Edouard Machery
Contact :
Edouard Machery (edouardmachery@hotmail.com)
Université de Paris-Sorbonne, philosophy dpt
80-82, rue de la Roquette
Bâtiment D
75011 Paris
France
The language
of thought hypothesis (LOTH) claims that thoughts are complex
mental representations (MRs) compounded out of simpler MRs (concepts)
in a syntactic way. Now the conscious inner speech seems to
corroborate partly this thesis. The introspective argument draws
on that point (Carruthers, 1996):
1/ The introspection suggests that our conscious thoughts tokens
are subvocalized natural language sentences.
2/ Barring any cogent objection, we are entitled to trust the
outcome of introspection.
3/ There are no cogent objections.
4/ Hence, conscious thoughts are subvocalized natural language
sentences.
5/ Hence, LOTH is at least true of the conscious thought, though
it does not require any mentalese.
This paper claims that at least when the truth of LOTH is in
question, the introspection cannot be justifiably trusted :
hence the crucial premise 2/ is wanting. Our objection consists
of two theses:
A/ LOTH concerns the vehicles of our thoughts.
B/ We don't have any introspective access to the properties
of the vehicles of our thoughts.
This paper argues for both theses and responds to a possible
argument against B/ :
/ The forms of inner speech sentences causally drive the reasoning.
/ We have an introspective access to these forms.
/ Only properties of the vehicles of our MRs are causally efficient.
CS1-3.4
Compositionality and Introspection
Markus Werning
Contact:
Markus Werning (markus.werning@uni-erfurt.de)
Erfurt University
P.O.Box 900221
99105 Erfurt
Germany
The opinions
that introspective thoughts are possible and that thought is
semantically compositional, the paper argues, can only be reconciled
if we assume that introspective thoughts are formed in a language
that combines symbolic elements from expressible sub-symbolic
elements.
Since an introspective
thought reports another thought, it should be understood analogous
to the report of a sentence by another sentence, i.e., as quotation.
There are two options to analyze quotation. The first option
postulates the rule: If p is a well-formed symbol of the language,
then 'p' is a well-formed symbol of the language and the meaning
of 'p' is p. This option, it is shown, violates the principle
that the meaning of a syntactically complex symbol is determined
by the meanings of its syntactic parts and the syntactic rule
by which the parts are combined. The second option treats quotations
as concatenations from a finite set of sub-symbolic elements.
This option is consistent with compositionality, but requires
that sub-symbolic elements are expressible in the language.
Unlike formal
languages and Mentalese, natural languages do build symbolic
elements, i.e., morphemes, from expressible sub-symbolic elements,
i.e., phonemes. It is concluded that introspective thoughts
necessarily are formed in (imagined) natural (i.e. phonetic)
language.
CS1-4.1
A Home for Wayward HOTs
Jared Blank
Contact:
Jared Blank (jaredblank@mindspring.com)
769 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10014
I intend to
defend the Higher Order Thought (HOT) theory of consciousness,
advocated by Rosenthal, from its most damaging criticism: the
Wayward HOTs Objection. A principle explanatory virtue of the
HOT theory is that it analyzes consciousness in terms of a semantic
relation between HOTs and their targets. A mental state is conscious,
according to the theory, when one is in a higher order state
the content of which is just that one is in the target state.
The character of the conscious experience, though, is determined
by the representational content of the HOT even when the HOT
is wayward or misrepresents the target state. Given wayward
HOTs power to determine one's conscious experience, the explanatory
relevance of the relation between HOTs and their targets has
been questioned; if HOTs determine the character of conscious
experience when they misrepresent their target states then the
general explanatory function of the target states seems to be
rendered impotent. Though I show how Rosenthal's response to
this criticism is inadequate, certain aspects of it prove to
be instructive: I demonstrate how they point the way towards
a proper understanding of the relation between HOTs and their
targets and so to a resolution of this criticism.
CS1-4.2
Self-Ascription and Co-Consciousness: A Neo-Kantian view
Alan Thomas
Contact:
Alan Thomas (alanthomas@clara.co.uk)
Department of Philosophy
University of Kent at Canterbury
Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF
United Kingdom
This paper
explains our capacity to self-ascribe our mental states and
the unity of consciousness expressed by the exercise of such
a capacity. Shoemaker has argued that a functionalistically
describable subject "self-tokens" its first-order
beliefs, via reliably functioning cognitive mechanisms, so as
to meet a defensible co-consciousness requirement. This paper
develops a rival view (more radically Kantian). Kant offers
a tri-partite account of consciousness: an adverbial theory
of first order consciousness, an account of the necessity of
self-ascription, and an account of self-consciousness as clearly
distinct from the other two phenomena. The perspectival character
of first order conscious experience is the basis of a capacity
to self-ascribe conscious mental states that shows, but does
not say, the unity of the conscious mental life of that subject.
This avoids an important problem for higher order theories of
consciousness: the fact that our conscious mental lives are
unified is shown by the exercise of a capacity for self-ascription
that can be deployed by a subject who does not possess the concepts
of a self, or of mental kinds. Thus, an account can be given
of the unity of the self that avoids crediting a conscious subject
with a concept of itself that makes the account circular. Overall,
the paper serves to undermine the idea that a mental state is
conscious if it is in some way "targeted" by an inner
analogue of the intentionality of those states that are directed
"outwards".
CS1-4.3
Wine, Words, and What It's Like
Josh Weisberg
Contact:
Josh Weisberg (jwsleep@aol.com)
236 Dekalb Ave.
Brooklyn, NY
11205
In the course
of learning the art of wine tasting, one acquires a variety
of new words for picking out subtle variations in the taste
of wine. Words like "flinty" "tannic" and
"peppery" are taught to the novice, who then learns
to categorize wines appropriately. Arguably, learning these
words, and the mental concepts that they express, actually influences
what it is like to consciously experience the rich gustatory
sensations of the wine. Prior to acquiring the concepts, the
wine tastes one way; afterwards, the experience is different.
David M. Rosenthal (1997, forthcoming) has argued that wine
tasting, and related cases, provide a degree of support for
the "higher-order-thought" (HOT) hypothesis of mental
state consciousness. In this presentation, I will explore this
claim, and consider if there are viable competing explanations
of the cases. I will also investigate the close connection between
consciousness and the learning of words and concepts, from the
perspective of the HOT theory.
REFERENCES
Rosenthal, David M. (1997) "Apperception, Sensation, and
Dissociability," Mind and Language 12, 2 (June): 206-223.
Rosenthal, David M. (forthcoming) "Explaining Consciousness,"
in Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings,
ed. David J. Chalmers, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
CS1-4.4
The Self-Consciousness of Consciousness: Conceptual Convergence
and Clues to an Ontology
Kenneth Williford
Contact:
Kenneth W. Williford (kwillifo@zeus.ia.net)
Department of Philosophy
The University of Iowa
269 EPB
Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
The claim
that all consciousness is self-consciousness is typically met
with a number of important objections. Doesn't the claim lead
to an infinite regress? Doesn't it seem phenomenologically inaccurate:
surely we can think of objects other than ourselves? What about
infants and animals lacking a "self-concept"? What
about long-distance truck driving? What about unconscious mental
processing? The present paper seeks to obviate some of and accommodate
the rest of these objections by recovering, clarifying (both
phenomenologically and conceptually), and defending a version
of the thesis that has largely been forgotten, viz., that all
consciousness is implicit, marginal, tacit, or non-positional
consciousness of itself. The thesis, articulated notably by
Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and Gurwitsch, has more recently been
defended by David Woodruff Smith and Tomis Kapitan. I distinguish
the thesis from its relatives, so-called "higher-order
thoughts" theories of consciousness, and note some of its
advantages. In particular, I argue that a proper understanding
of the thesis leads to the following: 1) A unification of many
apparently disparate descriptions of consciousness found in
theorists as different as Douglas Hofstadter, Antonio Damasio,
et al. 2) A clarification of the often misunderstood relation
between the constant, implicit reflexivity of consciousness
and the sporadic, explicit reflectivity manifest in thoughts
that employ a robust concept of the self. 3) A unification of
phenomenological work on consciousness with work inspired by
the logic of self-reference (e.g., Hofstadter,Perlis, Bojadziev),
along with an articulation of a phenomenological method that
stresses the importance of the formal features of consciousness
as opposed to its overly emphasized qualitative ones. 4) An
indication of vital clues to the solution of several outstanding
problems in the theory of consciousness: qualia, the semantic
determinacy of thought!, the unity of consciousness, the capacity
for reflection, volitional causation, and the hard problem itself.
CS2-1.1
Neuromagnetic correlates of perceptual convergence in primary
visual cortex
John-Dylan Haynes, Gerhard Roth, Michael Stadler & Hans-Jochen
Heinze
Contact:
John-Dylan Haynes (haynes@www.h-w-k.de)
c/o Abteilung fuer Neuropsychologie
Universitaet Bremen
Grazer Str. 6
28334 Bremen / Germany
Among the
various experimental paradigms that can be interpreted within
the framework of neural correlates of consciousness one has
unjustly received little attention:
"Perceptual convergence" refers to experiments designed
to track at which stage visual processing of stimuli that are
physically different but are perceived to be identical converges.
This is complementary to the "perceptual divergence"
approach as in multistable perception where a single stimulus
can lead to alternation between several interpretations. Here
we demonstrate that perceptual convergence for low level features
such as contrast may occur as early as primary visual cortex
using a combination of EEG and MEG with source localisation.
Stimuli with the same physical contrast but very different perceived
contrasts due to lateral masking elicit very different responses
in primary visual cortex. However stimuli that are psychophysically
adjusted to match but have very different physical contrasts
evoke highly similar responses in V1, especially at a later
feedback stage of processing. This is discussed in the light
of recent evidence that primary visual cortex may play a
larger role in direct conscious representation of low level
visual features than previously thought.
CS2-1.2
Two Modes of Conscious Visual Perception: Cerebral Sites &
Cortical Mechanisms
Shaul Hochstein & Merav Ahissar
Contact:
Shaul Hochstein (shaul@vms.huji.ac.il)
Institute of Life Sciences
Neural Computation Center
Hebrew University
Jerusalem, Israel 91904
We report
a new view, dividing conscious perception into two modes: rapid
"vision at a glance" and slower "vision with
scrutiny". The dichotomy encompasses a wide variety of
phenomena, including our ability to perceive complex images
even when these are presented at very rapid rates (RSVP) but
a surprising inability to note seemingly large changes in flashed
pictures (change blindness). We attributes rapid conscious vision
with spread attention to the large receptive fields of high-level
cortical areas, where neurons respond to complex images but
generalize over precise object location, orientation, size,
lighting or particular details that originally formed the recognized
category. In contrast, slower perception with focused attention
is seen as a conscious return to lower cortical levels following
reverse-hierarchy feedback connections to the ultimate sources
of higher level activation, recovering detailed information
available in the specialized receptive fields
found there. Indeed, the characteristics of these perceptual
modes match those of higher and lower areas, respectively. This
dual correspondence is especially apparent in the two modes
of visual search: Spread- attention feature search ("what"
without "where") derives not from low-level cortical
areas as previously assumed, but from higher-level position-insensitive
receptive fields. On the other hand, scanning-attention difficult
or conjunction search derives from explicit perception's return
to low-level position-encoding receptive fields. We present
additional perceptual phenomena, backed by physiological data,
in support of this novel Reverse Hierarchy Theory. Thus, conscious
perception begins at post-hierarchical processing high cortical
levels where complex images are perceived with spread attention,
and later dips back down in reverse hierarchy fashion to focus
attention on specific details represented in low cortical level
receptive fields.
CS2-1.3
Change Detection, Visual Representation, and Consciousness
Douglas B. Meehan
Contact:
Douglas B. Meehan (dbmeehan@yahoo.com)
CUNY Graduate Center, Philosophy Program
365 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10016-4309
Change blindness
experiments show that subjects are often unaware of significant
changes in visual scenes. This suggests that we don't see in
as much detail as we believe we do. Kevin O'Regan and Alva Noë
(forthcoming) conclude that visual perception doesn't involve
detailed picture-like representations, giving an alternative
explanation of visual experience in terms of our implicit knowledge
of correlations between visual stimulation and eye-movement.
This rejection
of visual representations assumes, however,
that if they did occur, we would have exhaustive access to them.
But we don't have exhaustive access to our perceptual states,
as unconscious perception shows. Further, there is evidence
that we can detect changes in visual scenes even when we cannot
report doing so (Fernandez-Duque and Thornton, 2000).
These considerations
suggest, I argue, that we can best
explain change blindness not by supposing that there are no
visual representations but by recognizing that we sometimes
aren't conscious of them. That, in turn, is best explained in
terms of a higher-order theory of consciousness (e.g., Rosenthal,
1997). Finally, I explain the nature of the representations
involved in visual experience with Sellars' (1956) view that
families of mental properties are
homomorphic to families of visible stimulus properties.
Fernandez-Duque
and Thornton (2000). Change detection
without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation
of change in the visual system. Visual Cognition, 7, 324-344.
O'Regan, Kevin and Noë, Alva (forthcoming). A Sensorimotor
Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 24(5).
Rosenthal, David M. (1997). A Theory of Consciousness. In N.
Block, O. Flanagan, G. Güzeldere (Eds.). The Nature of
Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sellars, Wilfrid (1956). Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.
In Science, Perception and Reality. Atascadero: Ridgeview, 1963.
CS2-1.4
Evidence for a non-continuous transition between conscious and
unconscious processing of visual stimuli
Claire Sergent & Stanislas Dehaene
Contact:
Claire SERGENT (clairesergent@yahoo.com)
4, place du General Leclerc
91401 ORSAY
FRANCE
If two targets
are to be identified among distractors displayed in rapid sequence,
correct identification of the 1st target hinders identification
of the 2nd. This phenomenon is called the Attentional Blink.
We used in this phenomenon to investigate the nature of the
transition between unconscious and conscious processing of visual
stimuli.
We asked participants
to evaluate the visibility degree of the 2nd target on a continuous
scale. There were two main conditions : a condition in which
identification of the 1st target was required ("dual task")
which produced an attentional blink on the 2nd target, and a
condition in which no identification of the 1st target was required
("single task") producing no impairment on the 2nd
target. In both conditions, the target was absent in half of
the trials.
During the attentional blink (dual task), participants used
the continuous scale in a bimodal way : they mainly used the
higher or the lower visibility degrees and hardly ever used
intermediate visibility. A multiple regression on this pattern
of response revealed that it was a combination of the patterns
obtained when the 2nd target was absent and when it was present
and easily detected (single task).
These results
suggest that, during the attentional blink, the 2nd target is
either perfectly identified or not detected at all. Thus, unconscious
processing obtained by manipulation of attention would be better
discribed as an alternative to the conscious processing than
as an impoverishment of the conscious processing.
CS2-2.1
Consciousness, Inner Speech & Language
Garry Briscoe
Contact:
Garry Briscoe (briscoe@uwosh.edu)
Computer Science Department
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
800 Algoma Blvd.,
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54901, USA
While some
contend that language is important for higher states of consciousness,
this presentation proposes that it is not language per se that
is essential, but rather inner speech, our ability to converse
with ourselves.
The traditional
view of language holds that external speech sounds are processed
within Wernicke's area in the left posterior temporal cortex,
where composite words are recognized. This model further proposes
that language signals then travel to Broca's area in the left
inferior frontal lobe where expressive language is encoded into
articulatory form. Recently, however, this view of language
has come under challenge as researchers, using mainly imaging
techniques, have noted language tasks that seem to involve cortical
regions outside of those associated with the classical models.
A new neural
model of cortical processing will be outlined in which streams
of neural activations enter the system at primary sensory areas,
and proceed through association and frontal areas. These flows
are multiply recurrent, and so represent a highly dynamic system.
The majority of flows are concerned with unconscious bodily
behaviors, and involve the learning of perceptual (nameless)
concepts that link external sensory inputs with corresponding
learned motor behaviors; in other words, learned skills.
The language
component of the proposed model extends that of the classical
theory, suggesting that multiple areas of the cortex are involved
in the processing of language. For example, it is now known
that flows along the superior temporal cortex are involved in
speech recognition. The model proposes that the function of
the temporal cortex is that of a differentiation device, allowing
sounds to be recognized as particular words. Recurrently linked
self-organizing maps allow just such an interpretation.
The model
proposes that incoming auditory inputs are divided into essentially
two streams (as is supported by recent experimental results),
one stream traveling along the superior temporal lobe, and the
second traveling through the insular region to the frontal lobe.
It is this second flow that forms the major component of inner
speech. Recurrent linkages from Broca's area back to Wernicke's
area allow for the generation of internally-generated pseudo-sound
sequences that form inner speech. In other words, a part of
the cortex (Broca's area) that is adjacent to motor areas responsible
for expressive speech, is able to generate internal speech that
travels directly to auditory input areas rather than travel
through the external medium of the environment. A similar proposal
for the visual modality allows for inner signing.
The presentation will describe primary consciousness as resulting
from neural flows not involved with inner speech. This form
of consciousness is shared by other animals, and involves being
awake and alert, and being able to link sensory inputs with
connected motor outputs.
Inner speech,
however, forms a major part of the experience of consciousness
for humans, and this additional component of consciousness is
termed secondary consciousness. Inner speech allows us to bifurcate
the world into multifaceted concepts, and provides a mechanism
for direct inner awareness. Without inner speech, conscious
experience is greatly reduced, and several neurological deficits
(such as blindsight) will be used to illustrate this point.
CS2-2.2
The Statistical Brain: Reply to Marcus' The Algebraic Mind
Francisco Calvo Garzón
Contact:
Francisco Calvo Garzón (fjcalvo@um.es)
Departamento de Filosofía
Edificio Luis Vives
Universidad de Murcia
E-30100 Murcia (Spain)
Gary Marcus
(The Algebraic Mind, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001) distinguishes
two separate ontologies in the connectionist realm: implementational
connectionism and eliminative connectionism. The former accounts
for cognitive phenomena by positing sets of explicit rules that
serve the purpose of symbolic manipulation. The latter, in terms
of computational abilities which are the result of an associative
memory. Marcus argues that the connectionist models which preserve
their computational equivalency with respect to classical ones
are those that implement classical rules. In this notice, I
shall offer a three-fold reply to Marcus: First, (i) I shall
argue that he does not provide a robust criterion to decide
when a network implements a rule. Second, (ii) I'll argue that
his proposal to implement recursive combinations by means of
encodings where tokens that belong to the same representational
type are identical lacks biological plausibility. And finally,
(iii)
I'll argue that even if points (i) and (ii) were wrong, the
neural substrate may impose limitations on the mechanisms that
permit the system carry out the appropriate computations. These
limitations may tip the balance in favour of a (biologically
plausible) Hebbian arquitecture. I shall conclude that Marcus
fails in his attempt to override eliminative connectionism.
CS2-2.3
Automaticity of Semantic Processing on a Sentence Level
Dana Ganor & Joseph Tzelgov
Contact:
Dana Ganor (danaga@bgumail.bgu.ac.il)
Dept. of Behavioral Sciences
Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Beer Sheva, Israel 84105
Tzelgov's
(1997) definition of automatic processing as being processing
that takes place although it is not part of a task requirement,
was used as a basis for investigating automaticity of semantic
processing on a sentence level. In the first series of studies
the effect of type of experimental task on the conditions under
which the automatic process would take place was investigated.
Will automatic processing occur only when the experimental task
triggers it? To study automatic semantic processing, the type
of experimental task was varied from one which involves a process
similar to semantic processing (i.e., syntactic processing),
to one that involves a linguistic process on a lexical level,
and to one that involves a non-linguistic process (i.e., font
judgment). Under all three tasks evidence was found for automatic
semantic processing. The second series of studies examined whether
automatic semantic processing took place when sentences were
not well formed
(i.e., containing grammatical errors or presented in a scrambled
order). It was found that subjects extracted meaning from sentences
that were poorly constructed even though they were not asked
to do so. The results suggest that semantic processing of sentences
occurs automatically, regardless of experimental task and the
quality of presented material.
CS2-2.4
Time and space in phoneme perception.
Kei Omata & Ken Mogi
Contact:
Ken Mogi (kenmogi@csl.sony.co.jp)
Takanawa Muse Bldg.
3-14-13, Higashigotanda
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0022 Japan
Phoneme perception
is an important step in language cognition. The McGurk effect
(McGurk & MacDonald 1976), where a simultaneous presentation
of incompatible visual and auditory stimuli leads to a misperception
of phonemes, demonstrates that audiovisual integration plays
an essential role in phoneme perception. Here, we report a series
of psychophysical experiments aimed at elucidating the spatio-temporal
constraints involved in the integration process. Using modern
technologies, incompatible visual and auditory stimuli were
presented with various timing and localization conditions. Presentation
of the visual and auditory stimuli in the right egocentric field
resulted in a stronger McGurk type effect, possibly related
to the left hemisphere dominance of language processing. The
effect of the proximity of audio and visual stimuli also exhibited
a marked lateral asymmetry. Taking into account the results
on the effect of timing in experiments of our own and others
(e.g. Munhall et al.1996), we construct a model of the spatio-temporal
?streamlining? involved in the integration process. Our model
puts phoneme perception within the context of the more general
neural mechanisms of multimodal integration, with a particular
emphasis on the relation to the egocentric spatio-temporal perception,
such as body image
CS2-3.1
Reflective consciousness and intentionality
Lisa Bortolotti
Contact:
Lisa Bortolotti (lisab@coombs.anu.edu.au)
Philosophy Program RSSS
Coombs Building ANU
ACT 0200 Canberra
AUSTRALIA
According to Davidson, one can be a believer only if one has
the concept of 'belief' and is able to recognise oneself and
others as believers. These requirements are often tied to the
presence of reflective consciousness and linguistic abilities.
In the literature on animal cognition there is scepticism about
non-human animals (even primates and dolphins) being reflectively
conscious and viewing themselves and others as intentional systems.
Thus, Davidson's view seems to imply that non-human animals
cannot entertain beliefs. In Rational Animals (1982) and The
Emergence of Thought (1997), he explicitly denies that non-human
animals and human infants can be believers. I find this consequence
of Davidson's requirements on belief possession implausible
and I suggest an alternative view. Suppose we construe a minimal
account of belief, where beliefs are simply mental states with
content that are formed on the basis of some evidence, can be
revised on the basis of some other evidence and can be acted
upon. Then perceptual consciousness, but not reflective consciousness,
seems to be necessary for a creature to be a believer.The requirements
for rational believers, instead, require the capacity of the
creature to critically examine her own mental states, evaluate
evidence and aim at consistency and coherence. This is the kind
of cognitive achievement that seems precluded to most non-human
animals.My suggestion has one clear advantage over Davidson's.
It allows us to see continuity between human and non-human animal
cognition and to describe non-human animals as intentional systems
when they categorise, learn and communicate.
CS2-3.2
Content and Infant Consciousness
Sarah E. Clegg
Contact:
Sarah Eleanor Clegg (pip00sec@sheffield.ac.uk)
Department of Philosophy
University of Sheffield, Western Bank
Sheffield, S10 2TN
United Kingdom
In recent years representational theories of phenomenal consciousness
have grown in both popularity and number. Among these theories
are the much discussed higher-order thought (HOT) theories which
state that a mental state is conscious just in case it is, or
is disposed to be, targeted by a higher-order thought about
itself. One of the most common objections levelled against such
theories (e.g. Dretske 1995) is that they exclude infants and
autistic individuals. In this paper I argue that the objection
can be answered, but that doing so depends on both the account
of content and on the version of HOT theory adopted. In particular,
I outline how adopting a teleosemantic theory of intentional
content will allow *dispositional* higher-order thought theories
to escape from this objection. Such an account of intentional
content, allows us to show that an infant's experiences are
phenomenally conscious in virtue of their function. I argue
that, given a normal developmen
t, the function of the infant's perceptual experiences is to
feed into higher-order thoughts about themselves regardless
of whether the relevant higher-order systems are in place. In
the same way, I shall argue that autistic people will also be
phenomenally conscious according to Dispositional HOT theory.
CS2-3.3
Language and Theory-of-Mind Development: 4-Year-Old Spanish
Children's Linguistic Abilities in the Understanding of False
Belief.
Belén Pascual, Jaime Nubiola, Gerardo Aguado & María
Sotillo
Contact:
Belén Pascual (mpasmel@alumni.unav.es)
Dept. Educación
Universidad de Navarra
E-31080 Pamplona
The main period
of theory-of-mind development, the ability to seeing oneself
and others in terms of mental states (beliefs, desires, intentions,
imagination, emotions, and so on), is also the major period
of language acquisition, from 2- to 5-year-olds. Studies of
thought and language in child development are usually focused
on two fields: 1) the capacity of children to represent false-beliefs,
and 2) their linguistic abilities that provide the representational
format needed to understand false-belief, including the contributions
of syntax and semantics.
The present
study explores the relationship between natural language production
and the classic false-belief task performance in a sample of
twenty-five children between 3;11 and 4;2-year-old. The natural
language, transcribed and analyzed using CHAT codes and CLAN
programs provided by the CHILDES Project (MacWhinney, 1995),
was assessed according to four focal components: mean length
of utterance (MLU), syntactic complexity, grammatical form of
sentences with mental verbs and the frequency of their occurrence.
Findings are consistent with the claim that language is fundamental
to theory-of-mind development (Astington & Jenkins, 1999;
Segal, 1998; de Villiers, 2000; Zelazo, 1999).
CS2-4.1
RATIONALITY AND ACCESS CONSCIOUSNESS
Matteo Mameli
Contact:
Matteo Mameli (g.mameli@lse.ac.uk)
London School of Economics
Dept. of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom
Is access
consciousness necessary for (theoretical or practical) rationality?
Does one need to be able to register one's own mental states
in order to be rational? Does rationality require the ability
to represent to oneself the contents of one's own thoughts?
Does it require the ability to report to others the contents
of one's own thoughts? The answers to these questions depend
on what one means by 'rationality'. I argue that there are at
least two distinct theoretical roles that 'rationality' plays
in discussions about the correctness of thought and behaviour.
That is, there are at least two distinct concepts of rationality.
If one is thinking about rationality in terms of one of these
two concepts, then it can be shown that access consciousness
and reportability are not required for rational thought and
behaviour, and that, in some cases and for some tasks, one can
be more rational by not having access consciousness or by not
using it. In contrast, if one is thinking about rationality
in terms of the other concept, then access consciousness becomes
an essential feature of rationality, and reportability (in case
this is distinct from access consciousness) becomes a tool for
being more rational.
CS2-4.2
Why are some verbal-like thoughts amenable to consciousness?
Benny Shanon
Contact:
Benny SHANON (b.shanon@mscc.huji.ac.il)
Department of Psychology
The Hebrew University
Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, Israel
The relationship
between consciousness, thought processes and language is examined
on the basis of the analysis of thought sequences, that is -
trains of verbal-like expressions that spontaneously pass through
people's heads. A large corpus of such sequences was collected
and subject to various structural analyses. In this presentation,
I consider the possible functional advantages of the conscious
experience of thought sequences. I propose that such an experience
affords mentation with a quality of rawness analogous to that
associated with perception. This entails three functional benefits.
First, rawness allows for non-fixedness in terms of prior codification,
and thus affords fluidity in the progression of thinking and
hence potential cognitive novelty. Second, rawness provides
a medium that makes the thinking process akin to action in the
real world. In this fashion, consciousness may be viewed as
affording a virtual reality in which cognitive agents may act
when concrete
action in the real world is not feasible. Third, verbal-like
articulation results in objectivization that provides compartmentalization
of thought and serves as the basis for further reflection. While
the present discussion is based primarily on the analysis of
verbal-like expressions, it is pointed out that analogous patterns
are encountered in other domains of cognitive activity. Together,
these suggest a new perspective by which the function of consciousness
may be considered.
CS2-4.3
Access consciousness and its phenomenal properties
Finn Spicer
Contact:
Finn Spicer (finn.spicer@kcl.ac.uk)
13 Herbert Crescent
London
SW1X OHB
This paper
offers a model of how we have authoritative access to consciously
held propositional attitudes-an account of what access-consciousness
consists in. The account is in terms of an ability one has to
token a first-order thought at will (an 'entertaining' of a
content), and then (by inner demonstrative) form a demonstrative
concept which types propositional attitudes according to content
(Fregean sense). The ability to entertain a thought at will
is described as a product of the language faculty, and is close
to what is known as 'inner speech'. Like inner speech, an entertaining
of a content has phenomenal-conscious properties; hence this
account offers an explanation of why certain phenomenal properties
attach to access- consciousness propositional attitudes.
CS3-1.1
Impaired implicit cognition following frontal brain injury
Lynne Barker & Jackie Andrade
Contact:
Jackie Andrade (j.andrade@shef.ac.uk)
Dept of Psychology
University of Sheffield
Western Bank
Sheffield S10 2TP, UK
Frontal brain
injury is associated with deficits in conscious cognition such
as planning, sustained attention, decision making. Marked changes
in personality, emotional lability and social behaviour are
also seen. Theoretical accounts that emphasise disorders of
controlled attention and goal-directed behaviour give little
insight into these more socially-mediated aspects of the disorder.
We hypothesised that deficits in implicit cognition may contribute
to behavioural changes manifested after frontal damage. We tested
15 people with frontal brain injury on a battery of tests including
the WAIS, WMS and BADS, the latter giving measures of executive
function. We compared their performance with that of 14 age-
and IQ-matched controls on two tests of implicit cognition:
a serial reaction time task (SRTT) and an implicit memory task
that measured the mere exposure effect as an increase in preference
for previously presented non-words. The control group showed
significant learning on the SRTT (p < .001) and a mere exposure
effect (p < .03). Frontal patients showed no evidence of
learning on the SRTT and no effect of exposure to the non-words
(p > .10). We will discuss the relationship between these
impairments in implicit cognition and patients' problems with
social behaviour and explicit cognition.
CS3-1.2
Evidence for unconscious learning during anaesthesia
Catherine Ha